In the journal Nicollet kept during the expedition, he called the rock "old red sandstone". But in his 1843 report this was expanded to hardened sandstone or quartzite. Thus Nicollet recognized the rock's true nature. Sand grains were present yet the rock was much harder than sandstone. But is it quartzite?
Others disagree. Sandstone that is so well-cemented that it fractures through the sand grains rather than across them is indeed quartzite:
Nicollet's very hard rock does indeed break across the grains (Gries 1996, p. 77), but the terminology dispute may be irrelevant. In 1870, it officially became the Sioux Quartzite.
Like Nicollet, White found the rock to be extremely hard and yet so similar to sandstone:
The Sioux Quartzite contains no fossils, so to assign it a place in geologic time White relied on its position relative to other rock layers and its degree of alteration. Because it occurred below and was therefore older than Paleozoic strata in Iowa, and because it had been so thoroughly cemented, he tentatively placed it in "AZOIC SYSTEM. HURONIAN (?) GROUP"—among the oldest rocks in the region (3). Today's geologists agree.
In some ways we aren't much better off than White 150 years ago. Neither fossils nor absolute dates are available for the Sioux Quartzite, and its age continues to be constrained based on what's above and below. This makes it somewhere between 2.3 and 1.1 billion years old, a huge span. However there's a quartzite in Wisconsin that is very similar and probably was deposited at the same time—the Baraboo Quartzite. Its age is much more tightly constrained, between 1.76 and 1.64 billion years (Anderson 1987). Likely the Sioux Quartzite also is c. 1.7 billion years old.
The Sioux and Baraboo are thought to be remnants of a great wedge of sand that accumulated along the southern margin of a young North America (4). It was massive—to 3000 m thick! This is not far-fetched if we keep in mind that 1.7 billion years ago there were no plants on land. Erosion was far more consequential.
Now we're faced with another puzzle. How does a "mass of incoherent sand" (as White called it) become quartzite? Another Iowa geologist, Samuel W. Beyer, tried to answer this question in his early study of the Sioux Quartzite (1897). He looked at thin sections under a microscope and saw well-rounded grains of quartz (silica) strongly bound together with a quartz cement. This cement was difficult to explain. "[Because] it is improbable that the rock has been able to furnish sufficient silica to cement itself, the natural inference is that the percolating waters received their silica burden from some extraneous source ... perhaps a deposit long since removed".
Beyer's problem was timing—he lived too long ago. Geologists now know that quartzite can furnish sufficient silica to cement itself. For example if it's buried 2–3 km under younger deposits and temperatures reach c. 70º C, quartz cement can develop on the sand grains. For more, see burial metamorphism and authigenic quartz cement (great conversation starters too!).
What ever the source of cement, the quartzite ridge was extremely hard and persistent. It survived hundreds of millions of years of deposition and erosion, most recently by glaciers on a continental scale.
The Sioux Quartzite was buried once again, and remains mostly buried except for limited outcrops revealed by erosion. However well-drillers have encountered it below the surface over a much larger area—to about 45 miles west of Pierre and south into Nebraska.
On a rainy day in May, I took a break from botanizing and drove to Sioux Falls to restock my larder. Then I headed to the Palisades on Split Rock Creek to see something of the hiding dog. After the rain stopped I spent the evening admiring quartzite lit by golden light, as did Joseph Nicollet at the end of a rainy day in 1838:
Above and below: joints at right angles (orthogonal) are common in the Sioux Quartzite.
The next day we explored more of the Palisades, at a day-use area.
In putting together geology posts, I often discover I missed much of interest and therefore must return. That's definitely the case here. There's Pipestone National Monument of course, but also Jim Kersten's Sioux Quartzite Outcrop Trail—40+ sites in South Dakota, Minnesota and Iowa that feature the quartzite "naturally or architecturally"!! 😊
Notes
(1) Surveyor Joseph Nicollet left France, probably because of financial problems, and sailed to the United States thinking he could find work in the largely unmapped territories. He was first employed by a fur trading company. His resulting map of the upper Mississippi River so impressed staff of the new US Army Corps of Topographic Engineers that he was asked to lead the agency's first expedition. He surveyed the upper Mississippi drainage in 1838 and 1839, and surely would have done much more if he hadn't died young.
(2) Rock with quartz sand grains that are thoroughly cemented with quartz is sometimes called orthoquartzite or quartz arenite See Quartzite in Sandatlas.
(3) AZOIC SYSTEM. HURONIAN (?) GROUP is roughly equivalent to today's Archean rocks of the Superior Craton or the Huronian Supergroup. More here.
Sources, in addition to links in postAnderson, RR. 1987. Precambrian Sioux Quartzite at Gitchie Manitou State Preserve, IA. GSA Centennial Field Guide. PDF
Andrews, J. 2019? On the Quartzite Trail. South Dakota Magazine.
Beyer, S. W. 1897. The Sioux Quartzite and certain associated rocks. Iowa Geological Survey Annual Report 6:67-112. PDF
Gries, JP. 1996. Roadside Geology of South Dakota. Mountain Press Publishing Co.
Iowa DNR. Gitchie Manitou State Preserve in State Preserve Guide. PDF.
Johnson, C, et al. 2017. Metamorphic Environments in An Introduction to Geology. Salt Lake Community College online.
Nicolett, JN. 1843. Report intended to illustrate a map of the hydrographical basin of the upper Mississippi river. US Senate, 28th Congress, 2nd session, no. 237. BHL
Ojakangas, RW, & Weber, RE. 1984. Petrography and paleocurrents of the lower Proterozoic Sioux Quartzite, Minnesota and South Dakota. in Shorter Contributions to the Geology of the Sioux Quartzite. U. Minnesota Report of Investigations 32. PDF
Southwick, DL, Morey, GB, & Mossler, JH. 1986. Fluvial origin of the lower Proterozoic Sioux Quartzite, southwestern Minnesota. GSA Bull. 97:1432–1441.